Pedophile Website Stegl.Org Shutdown
January 25th, 2010 | by admin |
Cyber Crimes Us Organization http://cybercrimes.us
On Wed March 28th 2007 the site known as Seattle-Tacoma-Everett Girl Love (stegl) was shutdown following a Request-&-Demand we sent to the sites hosting company NetworkSolutions, the site was shutdown within minutes, the video of the Stegl.Org website owner gave an interview with a local washington state news company, and we have provided that video for you.
Duration : 0:3:3
[youtube epQwiGZf8Dk]
25 Responses to “Pedophile Website Stegl.Org Shutdown”
By CNash85 on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
It’s “paedophile”, …
It’s “paedophile”, not “pedophile”. Learn to spell, America!
By UnluckyGambler on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
oh yea, im totally …
oh yea, im totally for anarchism. even the chaotic version would be better than the system we have now.
however my preferred version of anarchism would be the venus project. ever heard of it? i highly recommend you, and everyone, to check it out. it changed my life, it could (and probably will) change yours ;]
By steveo9001 on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
well im over it …
well im over it your entitled to your opinion but good luck getting that law over thrown … i personally believe we shouldnt even have a government should just be a free world like in the wild. happens… just like if you get caught by someone who feels strongly about it … in my world with no government you would be murdered on the spot if caught rather than jail…. and he wouldnt be held accountable cause thats life happens … the wild is a lovely place
By UnluckyGambler on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
u dont have to do a …
u dont have to do a lot of things, doesnt mean u shouldnt do them. its all a matter of choice, and i believe in letting people choose whatever they want. these foolish social stigmas need to be destroyed. i for one have shed them all.
and i dont think most little kids like in their mouths… idk though, some could.
By steveo9001 on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
……………. to …
……………. to give the kid pleasure lol and love lol there are many other ways to make a kid happy and show them love… you dont have to stick your in their mouth >.>
By UnluckyGambler on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
give the child …
give the child pleasure and love, of course. sorry i didnt state it earlier, i often assume things are obvious to everyone when they are not.
By steveo9001 on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
yes i am having …
yes i am having trouble comprehending that … i will ask again … at least i think i asked it … what would be one of those good intentions ? what possible intentions could he/she have for sleeping with a 5 year old besides they wanted to have some oral sex and the 5 year old was a easy target
sooo yeh give me an example of those “best” intentions
By UnluckyGambler on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
ur thinking …
ur thinking application to real world situations, whereas im thinking theoretically.
yes, younger they are, easier to deceive. but adults get deceived too, and those deceptive moves are wrong. however, if done with the best of intentions, then age does not matter. it appears ur having trouble comprehending the phrase “with the best of intentions”.
By steveo9001 on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
….. with the best …
….. with the best of intentions ? what was his intention if he was one of those “good” pedos. His intention was to get his dick sucked and it was easier to do with a innocent being then it would be to get with a 20 year old girl or even a 14 year old … 14 year olds know how to say no a 5 year old does not
By UnluckyGambler on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
well, if it ruins …
well, if it ruins the girls life, then the guy did something wrong. thats my point.
if the guy does things with the best of intentions, then he is not to be blamed. that is my point. its really quite simple. most people like to unnecessarily complicate things like this.
By steveo9001 on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
i really dont know …
i really dont know what age has to do with anything … does the dog in the wild not another dog cause its 4 years younger? on the other hand it doesnt a pup cause its to tiny … after the age of 14 …its pretty much free game imo …they are old enough to know what they are doing they understand the problems it can cause and if they give consent that is their own fault not t he 45 year old mans
By steveo9001 on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
i really dont know …
i really dont know why people downrank comment specially ones like this
By steveo9001 on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
And when the pedo …
And when the pedo starts to have sexual relations with the child he didnt do it for the childs benifit he did it because its easier to trick a kid into having sex then it would be to go out and seduce a full grown women
By steveo9001 on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
cause sex at a low …
cause sex at a low age has ruined many girls lives … when has a computer ever made a 12 year old kid into an adult ? If a kid is exposed to sex at a low age maybe they will beome a when they get older cause they have been doing it since they were 5. oopppps i got aids … sex is nothing like a computer game reading books so on.
Your not getting the point of taking advantage of someone who is innocent and can be tricked into doing just about anything. they are to trusting
By UnluckyGambler on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
whats wrong with …
whats wrong with teaching children about sex? we teach children to use computers, play video games, read books, things they would not have just started doing without external help. so why is sexual pleasure alone picked out as the only unacceptable thing?
By steveo9001 on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
but this will never …
but this will never happen cause they dont know what sex is
By steveo9001 on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
you missed the …
you missed the point … children dont just walk up and ask for sex its always the adults idea … they dont even know or understand what sex is till someone introduces them to it .. …. point is i can get a kid to do something they might not have wanted to do had they been educated on the subject before hand. The ONLY situation where this argument would even be remotely possible would be if the child themselves walked over and started to preform sexual acts for no reason at all.
By UnluckyGambler on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
oh my argument is …
oh my argument is not on how to prevent/punish the bad ones, just on protecting the good ones. im sure u agree such relationships can and do exist, so all thats left is to figure out a way to protect the children from the bad ones, a job for engineers ;]
By steveo9001 on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
Idk i cant agree …
Idk i cant agree with you cause its wayyyyyyyyy to easy to TRICK a kid into doing pretty much anything. they are innocent and dont know any better. you really have no argument on this subject. I mean if you wake up in your bed and the 5 year old is sucking you off ..or your watching tv and the kid unzips your pants for no reason then that could be different. But if a child engages in sexual activity’s with an adult im 100% positive the adult “tricked” them into doing it or it was the adults idea
By UnluckyGambler on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
its tough to most …
its tough to most ppl, but simple to me ;]
this “ability” actually sucks. im like a freak, very few understand me ;/
anyways… separating the good from the bad will be difficult, and we should stop the bad people from hurting kids, just as we should stop the bad people from hurting adults. what i hate is how this up society outlaws ALL acts of pedophilia (one example of “crime” among uncountable ones) just because there are some bad cases, and because its difficult to sort out bad ones
By steveo9001 on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
idk thats a really …
idk thats a really tough line to call … so should we be busting the bad ones ?! and how can we tell the bad ones from the good ones ? im not saying there are good or bad pedos just going off what you said
this is such a tough subject along with many others … cause this earth is a pretty wild place … we wanna make it into this perfect world …animals in the wild dont see age they dont see murder they dont see rape they dont see all these things that we label as “bad”. its just nature
By UnluckyGambler on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
i meant what i said …
i meant what i said, and i was being serious.
note carefully what i said. its fine so long as it doesnt bring suffering, and its good if it brings pleasure. it seems that people often mistake what i mean as immediate/temporary pleasure and suffering, but no, i mean pleasure and suffering in both short and long terms, whichever one or both applies.
if the adult cared about the girl, he would have taught her about periods and pregnancy and all that. pedophilia itself is not wrong.
By steveo9001 on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
i do agree with you …
i do agree with you to some extent this response took me awhile .. cause i had to think .. like i said i agree that its ok as long as the child knows what the they are getting themselves into … i would say wait till 14+ >.>
another side of me is thinking your just a trolling which is most likely the case
as with anything in life you should educate yourself before you make a choice on anything
By steveo9001 on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
ok here … if the …
ok here … if the girl has been having sexual relations with an adult since she was 5 years old. One day she grows up and gets her period … has sex one more time and doesnt tell the man about this period cause she wasnt educated on sex and didnt know anybetter. or if not with the man with a friend. now she has a baby on the way at the age of 10-12. is this not “causing suffering”
if she was educated on sex she woulda worn a condom rather than just having sex cause it makes her “happy”
By UnluckyGambler on Jan 25, 2010 | Reply
so what if they …
so what if they give consent without knowing what theyre doing? thats life. just look at all the other things we HAVE to agree to when coming into this world, things we have no idea about. theres nothing wrong with pedophilia, the only thing wrong is causing suffering. if u make a 5 year old little girl happy and dont hurt her, where the is the wrong in that, right? ;]